Skip to main content

COPYLEFT

 



Impact of choosing different forms of copyleft


Copyleft (the opposite of copyright) goes hand in hand with free software and open source licences. Basically, it impacts us secondarily when developing software derivatives.
We can classify it into two types of copyleft:

- Strong copyleft: the ideal copyleft for people who are only in the business of using the software, the end users. For developers, creators of software derivatives are bound by the rules imposed by the software licence itself, such as retaining the same licence as the original software and not being able to appropriate the derivative in its entirety. This makes it difficult to integrate these derivatives into different software, especially with proprietary softwares.
The most significant example for this type of copyleft would be the GNU GPL licence, created in 1989 and with its other versions that came later, with their own freedoms and rules within the strong copyleft.

- Weak copyleft: as the name indicates, it is a little freer than strong copyleft. You still have to retain the licence on the derivatives but there are "fewer licence rules", making it easier to integrate these derivatives with other softwares. Within this type are usually libraries used to create code for projects, in this case when the software is ready, the library will not show the licence under which it is created.
An example would be Mozilla Public license (MPL) which apart from being in this category, has proprietary elements inside.

Finally we could highlight the non-copyleft, which as you can already guess are completely free software, perfect for developers who want to create their own software without retentions having absolute freedom for its derivatives. On the other hand, it would negatively affect end users, who could be left without software due to lack of support.
One of the most significant examples of this category would be the apache licence where different projects such as Apache Web Server or VLC have been created. 

What kind of copyleft licence is ideal for the creation of a project? 
Well, it depends a lot on the final purposes of the developer himself. The one that gives you more freedom is the non-copyleft, being able to create derivatives and privatise it for yourself. But of course you don't have as many softwares to choose from as in weak and strong copyleft. It all depends on your project.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

USABILITY, ERGONOMICS AND HCI

  These three characteristics are key in the IT world. It is good to think about these aspects when developing an IT-related idea. Why? Most of the software that is popular and successful in our society like Windows, Facebook or Google, if you look at it, are developed from these features. Without these, it will be difficult to reach people, which I'm not saying it's impossible, but it's a disadvantage in your project. Let's look at two opposite examples, one that has been successful and a parallel one that has failed, obviously based on usability, ergonomics and human computer interaction. The example of a bad design, we would talk about Microsoft Bob.  A graphical environment running on Windows 3.1 or 95 turned the operating system into a room where each piece of furniture represented a different application. In addition, a dog named Rover acted as an assistant and gave users advice. It was a huge failure, partly due to the success of Windows 95 that same year. As we

COPYRIGHT REFORM

  Today's copyright laws are even taking away everyday freedoms. In chapter two of the book  "The Case For Copyright Reform" (link below) he explains very well why copyright reform should be considered. He lays out a proposal for what a two-sided approach to copyright use might look like. In other words, a fair distribution of rights. Nowadays anything we do with a song, a book or anything created by someone protected by copyright is a punishment. The points he deploys from the proposition are the following: - A punish for people who claim to be the authors of something they have never made. - A completely free sharing of content as long as it has no commercial purpose. This was possible 20 years ago, but today it is a criminal offence. - A compulsory registration after 5 years of the rights of a content. Because nowadays we have problems with content where it is not clear who the author is and nothing can be done because there is no one to whom permission can be ask. - F

THREE INTERESTING IT SOLUTIONS

1980s: Machine Learning Do you know that today's massive algorithms probably know you better than you know of yourself? It all started with Alan Turin saying a famous and interesting phrase in the 1950s: Can machines think? That is when they started to investigate algorithms in which machines could learn by themselves from data. Until a few years later, when an IBM researcher named Arthur Lee Samuel created the first machine learning algorithm in the game of checkers and popularised it among IT researchers. For various reasons, there were about 25 years without any optimal algorithm results and the popularity of machine learning declined considerably, until the 1980s, when the backpropagation algorithm (neural network) was developed. From then on, different algorithms were developed and improved. Until today where machine learning is one of the most used fields collecting massive amounts of data and looking for patterns among them (without privacy) to improve the experience of each