Skip to main content

RHEL vs CentOS

 


Nowadays the are more than 300 Linux distros. There is no one better than the other, each distro is different and one of them can be perfect for one user or unusable for another one. But, inside these 300 there are the contintents distros, that they aquired most of users and developers of the society. The other distros we can see them as small islands, not too popular but they have their specifics fans users, perfectly suited for their needs or their cusiosity.




We are going to talk about two of the "continents" distros of Linux, their features, pros and conts, etc.

The first distribution I want to talk about is Red Hat Enterprise Linux (RHEL), the gold stantard for the commercial Linux distributions. It is a high quality distribution created by two young american guys in 1994, available for workstations, servers, mainframes and supercomputers. It has become the most deployed coomercial Linux distribution in the public cloud thanks to the support of software applications and hardware devices. The security is one the most important features for them using system-wide security policies so apps automatically use the appropiate cryptographic package and implementing a predictive IT analytics service that identifies potencial issues before they become a problems (kind of an IPS into the lifecycle of the distribution). Even that, RHEL recognizes that even his distributions aren't safe from potencially devastating cyberattacks. 

Seems really promising these distro but we can say as a disadvantage that you have to pay for the use of it. There is a free trial of 30 days but then you can see at the Red Hat Store that the prices starts at 299$ for RHEL Workstations, following the Server Edition 349$ and more. Even though, many of today's companies choose this distro for the high-quality and support that it provides.


We can move to the second "continent" distribution of Linux, and I chose to talk about CentOS (Community Enterprise Operating System). The comparisons between these two distributions are vey much in plain sigh as the major part of the goals between these two are almost the same. 

CentOS is a free server Linux distribution which curiously his upstream source is RHEL. Is not that difficult to get it up and run, newbies can do it without struggle. The beautiful feature about is that it costs nothing to use and can be a good learning path for developers and users who want to learn to manage servers and his features. Also it has a thriving community around that has created a wealth of learning resources. The downside of CentOS is that lacks enterprise level support and in general tends to be slightly behind RHEL, also it lacks certified cryptographic protection required on government networks.


There are many other interesting Linux distros such as Ubuntu, Debian, Fedora, Gentoo and so on. I talk about these two distros to see that even though they look very similar with almost the same goals, there are different with it upsides and downsides but they con suit to any user or developer, depending on the intentions.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

USABILITY, ERGONOMICS AND HCI

  These three characteristics are key in the IT world. It is good to think about these aspects when developing an IT-related idea. Why? Most of the software that is popular and successful in our society like Windows, Facebook or Google, if you look at it, are developed from these features. Without these, it will be difficult to reach people, which I'm not saying it's impossible, but it's a disadvantage in your project. Let's look at two opposite examples, one that has been successful and a parallel one that has failed, obviously based on usability, ergonomics and human computer interaction. The example of a bad design, we would talk about Microsoft Bob.  A graphical environment running on Windows 3.1 or 95 turned the operating system into a room where each piece of furniture represented a different application. In addition, a dog named Rover acted as an assistant and gave users advice. It was a huge failure, partly due to the success of Windows 95 that same year. As we

COPYRIGHT REFORM

  Today's copyright laws are even taking away everyday freedoms. In chapter two of the book  "The Case For Copyright Reform" (link below) he explains very well why copyright reform should be considered. He lays out a proposal for what a two-sided approach to copyright use might look like. In other words, a fair distribution of rights. Nowadays anything we do with a song, a book or anything created by someone protected by copyright is a punishment. The points he deploys from the proposition are the following: - A punish for people who claim to be the authors of something they have never made. - A completely free sharing of content as long as it has no commercial purpose. This was possible 20 years ago, but today it is a criminal offence. - A compulsory registration after 5 years of the rights of a content. Because nowadays we have problems with content where it is not clear who the author is and nothing can be done because there is no one to whom permission can be ask. - F

THREE INTERESTING IT SOLUTIONS

1980s: Machine Learning Do you know that today's massive algorithms probably know you better than you know of yourself? It all started with Alan Turin saying a famous and interesting phrase in the 1950s: Can machines think? That is when they started to investigate algorithms in which machines could learn by themselves from data. Until a few years later, when an IBM researcher named Arthur Lee Samuel created the first machine learning algorithm in the game of checkers and popularised it among IT researchers. For various reasons, there were about 25 years without any optimal algorithm results and the popularity of machine learning declined considerably, until the 1980s, when the backpropagation algorithm (neural network) was developed. From then on, different algorithms were developed and improved. Until today where machine learning is one of the most used fields collecting massive amounts of data and looking for patterns among them (without privacy) to improve the experience of each